I am a liberalist. Not in the American sense of politics, but the European one. We stand for free will, and strong in-land economies. We will certainly be termed nationalists, right-wingers, anarchists, and religious extremists. But they cannot harm us as we are peaceful warrior monks who simply protect our nations humanitarian rights. I am love, and light towards everyone.
We are against the satanic-technocratic attack on human health, knowledge, identity, and the Christian religion. It is a big attack on humanity by the Illuminati black brotherhood through mega-corporations, and a cultural-marxist state. Major corporations work against breakthroughs in health and medicine.
I believe we should submit to state and law, but at the same time we know how the jews, and early Christians fought for their belief in severe wars. So belief comes first before national laws of pretty politicians. Unleash the lawless ones. This is something you never hear in church as they most often misuse Romans 13:1-10
¨Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.
This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.
Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.
This was written at a time of Christian persecution; so that they had to bow to governance. The apostle Paul contradicts the book of acts where they gave everything to the church, and the early Christians did oppose the state; and were communist revolutionaries; hated by the Romans! Paul is argued over by many zealous Christians. Was he really a disciple of God? Why did scales fall of his eyes? Paul was a roman. Was he working for Rome when he wrote this?
This bibleverse of Romans 13 is no longer active. It is the reason why all Christians have become so dull.
Aristotle discovered the need for homogenous society to achieve perpetually peaceful society, or any society for that matter. We have now glorified Jesus, and discovered he unites the world with love and light! The world can only be one through humanistic homogenous ethics, not through a chaotic mixture of ethnic groups, and forced integration. The torch of light is passed to the aryan people to civilize their newcomers which liberate them from medieval Islam.
Demagoguery not democracy – enlighten people to vote.
The founding father of Greek Philosophy, Socrates is mentioned in Plato`s book 6 of the Republic. Socrates has a political conversation with Adimentus about voting by birthright leads to demagogury. Demagogury is when a politician appeals not through logic, or truth, but through false promises, easy solutions, and fear to gain votes.
Socrates argues that if you are heading on a sea journey through a storm. Who would you let control your ship (your government)? Unexperienced people or seafarers? That is the danger of birthright voting. In my opinion: Immigrants should not have the right to vote. Why is any un-educated person fit to judge who should be leader of a country? It is as dangerous as putting peasants in charge of a sea-journey through storm.
Like any other skill; the act of voting must be taught in the respectable country, according to Socrates. Education about politics, history, and having a populace who are all equally smart, and enlightened should be OPTIONAL when we have birthright voting. But that is not the case. Most of our populace have NO clue about leading a nation, yet vote anyways. Often voting for the left-wing demagoguery politicians who say not accepting immigrants is unethical with the Jewish aim to ruin their own countries economy, nationality, culture, religion, values etc. Career politicians use demagoguery all the time, since politics has been reduced to a game of popularity and career; steered by secret societies, and not a ship to steer the better evolution of humanity, which would have come through the white-ethnic humanistic values of native Christians. A humanistic national-romance revolution renaissance would inevitably have happened – evolving humanity in the right direction, had our society not been divided by a mass of mongrels and Islam.
I feel like Socrates myself. He experienced the idiocy of demagoguery himself when he was put to death by Hamlock in 399 BC by popular vote of 500 civilians where 52% voted for his crime of corrupting the youth of Athens. What a great tragedy. It is just like my own popularity contest.
We need a new nation of intellectual democracy, not democracy by birthright. The greatest defeat of the west was the dissolution of nobility. Descendants from European nobility has a much higher IQ, and sense of right and wrong. In my ideal ultra-liberalistic anarchistic theocracy nation: My intellectual democracy is where only the Christian noble-men, the native Christians, or citizens (of any race) pertaining to the Christian faith are allowed to vote. This should be self-explanatory. Christianity IS scientific truth, and why should we have room for error and corruption when our entire country is based upon the humanistic ethics of love/morale/humanism and light/enlightenment/knowledge?
Aristotle on homogenous society
History reveals how the power-elite has long used, and now desperately use immigration to stay in power, and destroy humanity before we wake up.
Here the greek philosopher Aristotle argue that tyrants keep power through appealing to immigrants (as they do today) , and that a true, liberal society can only be homogenous. (through ethics) He also argues that only a homogenous (ethnic majority) society can overthrow a tyrant:
One measure of the intellectual and moral degeneration of the West over the last decades is the now near-total ignorance of the founding Classics of Western civilization, even among the so-called educated class. Those who remain in ignorance of what superior minds have thought before them are condemned to remain as children, at best reinventing the wheel, rather than standing upon the shoulders of giants.
While the Classics were clearly written for a time and place very different from our own, their concerns often speak to us very directly. Aristotle’s Politics, his main political treatise, is replete with comments concerning the dangers of diversity and egalitarianism. Aristotle’s political thought does not soar to the eugenic and spiritual heights of Plato’s utopia. However, Aristotle’s moderate and pragmatic brand of politics is much more palatable to someone raised in modern liberalism, while at the same time being a better introduction to the communitarian and aristocratic political ethics of the ancient Greeks.
Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear:
Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13)
Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders.
Aristotle’s ideal of citizenship, entailing civic duties and group solidarity, necessarily requires a strong common identity and a sharp differentiation between citizens and foreigners. Conversely, foreign mercenaries had no solidarity with the people, and were thus frequently used by tyrants to enforce their unjust rule:
The guard of a [legitimate] king is composed of citizens: that of a tyrant is composed of foreigners. (1310B31)
It is a habit of tyrants never to like anyone who has a spirit of dignity and independence. The tyrant claims a monopoly of such qualities for himself; he feels that anybody who asserts a rival dignity, or acts with independence, is threatening his own superiority and the despotic power of his tyranny; he hates him accordingly as a subverter of his own authority. It is also a habit of tyrants to prefer the company of aliens to that of citizens at table and in society; citizens, they feel, are enemies, but aliens will offer no opposition.” (1313B29)
This passage brings to mind the Bolshevik tyranny in the early decades of the Soviet Union, when the government, and especially the secret police, was dominated by people from non-Russian ethnic groups. As Aristotle notes, under such a system any assertion of independence was ruthlessly crushed.
Aristotle also clearly expresses a related idea, that ethnic homogeneity enables the group solidarity that is needed to throw off tyrannical rule, while a diverse population with a no common identity is easier to rule. Aristotle, in order to enable leisure in the premodern era, argues for having a population of ethnically diverse slaves (something I, for reasons of civil peace and genetic integrity, would not endorse and especially not in the age of automation):
Thus, a mass of mongrels without identity is easier to rule than a self-conscious people, a truth which the hostile elites who rule the West seem to instinctively understand.
Globalism, and peace cannot be achieved through a mixing of ethnicities, but through an ethical homogenous society.
We see the same disaster happening today. The elite are appealing to the muslims, and betray the native Europeans: Destroying Europe to fulfill the goals of the black order NWO as paraphrased by masonic, and Jewish authors and authorities.. Their goal is a cold society without Christianity. Islam is merely a tool to reed out unorthodox Christian movements like f.i the Pentecostal movement. We live in a nation of insecure, individualistic sheep ruled by wolves, and owned by pigs. For the first time in history: Our generation have no cause of rebellion. The wolves are career politicians are destroying the western values by order of the lawish, anti-human philosophies of jewish oligarch bankers. They will destroy the core-christian family, and create a rootless NWO society in need of their police-state as paraphrased by occultist Alice Bailey of Lucifer`s Trust. Our nations of the west are ruled by secret societies with a common cause of evil. They recruit the aspiring new talents with gifts of power, drugs and sex. Especially popular are secret pedophile rings, which I have seen myself. We thus end up with a satanic technocracy, where expertise of a few philosopher kings rule their respective fields of society like media, government, medicine, science, history, weather, military etc. And who owns, and fund these? If you follow the money-trail, you will see it is: The old order of European oligarch jews. The mafia.
These evil control-freaks seek to bind the evolution, and natural growth of humanity in Europe so they can rule over rootless animals. Our warm society of love, unity, and potential is attacked by a demographic crisis through putting us against each other. Or as the saying goes: Order through chaos.
This cannot be allowed to happen. As of today: There is no Christian nation, or any white nation in the world. We ABSOLUTELY need our own state! The first Christian state in the New World! My obvious political stance is that of a right-wing liberalist, and I stand against the soul-tax-farm state corporation, their black brotherhood, and their corrupt media! We will soon discover our prideful history as aryans, but let`s make out the perfect system.
Burn it! It`s leading us straight to Hell for 2000 years! It`s like some insane evil one could make a funny movie about.
The current government is not instituted by God, opposes God, destroys our people, destroys our culture, and opposes the national constitution, and it`s old laws. It`s the same in America. The corporationalist globalists with the jewish elite is coming to ruin us, and I can prove it! YOU will write books on this, and start private-schools. YOU will gather your army, and march against the government, and crave the world`s first christian nation! It is our religious right to be heard! You took our lives, and all we had! I lost everything; even ALL my dreams! You oppose us who do good. We are punished for doing good, but not for doing wrong. And our taxes go to absolute waste. They are a mob. They`re trying to destroy us very efficiently.
THIS MUST END! The lions must rise! I will describe to you my ideal model for sustainable, happy, peaceful biblical society:
While Jesus envisioned a Platonian utopia, or one-world golden age under Davidic dynasty of God`s future appointed king of Israel, the only biblical government possibly implemented today is ultra-liberal survivalist (pseudo-anarchistic) theocracy (where there is only religious court) as biblically found under the times of Israel`s judicial patriarchy in the Old Testament, or the church where the church is an independent state as a communitaristic ideal society of commoners (idealists). In this monastic village, the church is an independent state, and functions as the head of societal building blocks inc hospital, media etc. In this communitaristic/monastic survivalist-example the church-complex/building will function as religious institution, judicial institution, school for children of all ages, and social welfare centre for misfits and elderly. <>
Anarchy is often equated with lawlessness, but that is not the case. Anarchy is the law of the jungle, but the jungle can be peaceful. For instance in communitarism. In hippie villages. In survivalist communitaristic villages. The principle of anarchy is a society without government or laws. Back to the garden of Eden so to speak. Anarchism arose as a principle of renaissance enlightenment; a child of namely liberalism. Anarchy is the ultimate form of liberalism; where every man is free to do his own will. Anarchism today is mostly defined by renown philosopher, and anarchist Noam Chomsky. The definition of anarchy as given by Chomsky is the purpose of testing the legitimacy of any authority.
What he means is that since anarchy is the law of the jungle, and the natural state of unhindered expression; it is up to that common sense, or will of the people; to legitimize a state. For instance. If I use my power to save my child from a passing truck; then my power as parent is legit. If the state use it`s authority to take away our rights, then anarchy must rebel. Get it?
If an authority is logically legitimate, its ok, and if not, then it`s up to the common sense of unhindered expression to reduce the authority of that state. That is the task of anarchism. For anarchy is the natural governmental form; with no indoctrination other than common human sense. The people really need to be freed from the illusions of their captors.
The people have the task to validate authority, and not the authorities themselves. Most evil people in power see themselves in the mirror each day, and think they`re good persons. The PEOPLE have the role to validate power both politically, economically or socially; based upon the archaic principles of the jungle. Power must always be in the right hands, and if not: We need a revolution. And that`s what we need today. For power is being misused today. We never had a chance to vote if we want Islam in Norway. We never know what the politicians hide. We see our economies, and rights being washed away. And my privacy has been attacked by the PST.
Today we have something called internalized authority. It`s the authorities themselves who legitimize the government. It should not be so.
When power, fame, and fortune is shared by an elite few; most officials look themselves in the mirror, and say ¨I`m a nice person doing what is right.¨
As long as the people are not starving, and as long as they control the news – the government of gangsters might get away with hijacking a country.
Neither officials, or civilians will ever think in the pattern that they might be serving evil, as we see most slave societies were legitimized by the slaves themselves.
So how did we end up with corrupt nations? How did we end up with Babylon?
It all started with the agricultural revolution in ancient Sumeria. Matriarchal nomadic tribes settled, and started organizing. They became patriarchal as they needed armies to protect their precious harvest and ladies. The ruler of the army became the new war-god, and eventually made himself a title: King. It may, or may not have been giant Nephilim, but that`s how we ended up with the current system. That`s where we`re heading. Back to the beginning of civilization. Back to Nimrod`s Babylon as author Thomas Horn states.
But if all agree to a common universal law; why would we need the King`s police, or his army to protect us? The system itself is the root of evil; for an army only serves a purpose if there is war, and borders only exist if there is an army. If Earth had a uniform ethic rule; there would be no need for nations. Nations only exist to serve the king, and the king exists as an evil to create war for the continuation of his nation. There is no tribal identity left in Norway. There is no ethnic, or national pride that defines the border of the nation. The nation exists only because of the authority; the King. And we are his soul-tax-farm. All talk about Israel`s tribes. But where are Europe`s tribes? Why did we make languages? Where are the Vikings? The King is a racist Davidic descendant. And his reign is so deeply rooted in our subconscious that we have forgotten it is evil despotism.
With a universal golden rule, a nation would neither be in need of politicians, a state, king, and as such; a nation does not exist other than as a trade federation. Corporationalism, and technocracy is the global future model; where a rich elite of oligarchs, primarily the jewish mafia; owns a communistic world, and the slave-like peasants. Will you let this happen? Will you let the elite politicians, and oligarchs create a communist Babylon? Or will you shed yourselves of your country, and start a right-wing ultra-liberalistic private-market revolution. Taking the power back to the people!
For the very idea of anarchy, and liberalism is freedom. Our future country, or tribes will be ethically homogenous through enlightenment. There will be no room for corruption, war or crime.
That`s why the law of love, and light is so pivotal.
Kingship comes from the Nephilim; not King David!
One of the Jewish ideologies is that God created the world to be ruled by kings. This is false masonic theology from the times when the Nephilim ruled over us. The kings are in no way the Davidic dynasty, but the philosophical remnant of a mob of anti-human activists! Jesus says his kingdom is not of this world. The prophet Samuel dealt with the ideological problem of kings as we saw earlier. This dethrones the entire Vatican supremacy, and right of kings. Jesus fulfilled the davidic prophecies is his heavenly reign, and not here on Earth. In Revelations 2:26, Jesus says we shall be given power to rule over nations. It is clear that God`s aim is setting up a kingdom, although the characteristics of this kingdom is described as a garden of Eden, and not that of the Vatican`s globalist antichrist, or the aristocratic elite. It is the Vatican that has globalized the world for 2000 years. Our theocracy will not be that of a regular ¨monarchy.¨
There is a great safety in having a righteous King who`s right to rule lie in him being the symbol of humanistic graeco-roman-judeo-christian unity, yet I still don`t believe in any king other than Jesus in Heaven. Only such a king would be representative of our people.
Jesus in Heaven dethroned the nietzscheistic idea of racist kingship, and worldly wisdom in general. The measure of true strength is the length of which they help the weak; balancing the equation of society. The disciples resorted to socialism due to persecution of a small group.
Now what governmental form should a civilization like Christians believe in? A fascist Christian theocracy of an everlasting king in Heaven.
I personally believe the Bible is clear there will be no representative king of Jesus in Heaven other than us disciples. Revelation 20:06 says we will reign with him for 1000 years, yet this is about Jesus reign from Heaven, and not here on Earth.
We need to make a representative church/government/spiritual leadership/theocracy on Earth in line with Heaven`s interests, and stop being apathic, gullible, and playing victims! You are meant to REIGN! Instead we dig our heads in the sand saying: We know we`re right about everything, but it`s only personal, and I have no ambition in what to do with it. I don`t care if atheism takes over science, and the school system. I don`t care about politics, revolution or nations. I am seated in Heaven, and will have no part with this world. This prevailing, passive view must end! We should try, and affect every outcome of what happens on Earth!
We must all take part in this world; either it`s this or that. The 1st century church is perhaps the greatest example of how powerful socialism can be. Any governmental model will work as long as there is an ethical majority of Christians. We must stand up for our beliefs to affect the outcome of this cauldron mixture of cultures. We must create an idea of utopia so perpetual, and good so that it`s very inception will make it`s completion inevitable. The idea of Love and Light.
I will break the wheel!
How did it go so wrong? I was walking down Aurdal in the mountains listening to nature, and pondered why the peasants living a monthly journey into the rugged inhospitable mountainsides should pay taxes to the danish, swedish (and now danish) king for 1000 years when they lived solely by themselves, and nobody from their village had ever seen Oslo, and had to strive to death to pay taxes working far away on a farm. Nothing has changed. Kings like being fed by sheep.
Ok. So they have a mental disorder that makes them think they are kings. That`s racism, at it`s most extreme. How have they managed to pull it off? The answer is simple. The kings create war. It started with the bloodliners back in Babylon. More wheat=more gold=more armies for protection because of resources, and now because of religious reasons. A country with divided ethics need a strong police for safety. That`s how the modern army of the king makes himself needed. Through immigration. The result is a cold, divided society of individualism, minorities, and flourishing hate. The goddess matriarchy of the stone age was pushed out, and the patriarchy of war-kings/gods like Marduk, Horus and Yahweh became the new inn.
It all started with the fall from tribal matriarchy to patriarchy kingships in ancient Sumer when farming began. Armies were provided to protect the harvest from other tribes. From there: The Illuminati was formed as the brotherhood of the snake, the Phoenician families, and the priesthood of Atum Re. We ended up with kingdoms, and the modern state was born as a growing cancer to feed the power-hungry king. Evil globalism bellowed out destroying every culture up until today: In the name of power. Because kingship was a success. Because taxation worked, and mankind could be kept as domestic animals! Their tool? Religion. (not our scientific truth) It was introduced for warfare, and as to give power to the king, and priestly elite, historically speaking.
There is nothing good about a nation or a king. It`s not God`s order at all. Taxation was originally introduced to fund the royal house, with threat of the Kings army. It also funded warfare since they needed rations when marching their armies. On, and on it spins. Will you break the wheel?
Soul, and tax-farm corporation Norway.
I want a golden age for my children! No more war! No need for a state! No need for kings. It`s Adam Weishaupt`s dream: Peace love anarcy. But no! The Hanseatic league invented something called corporation technocracy communism nwo. It`s a new worldwide state of Rothschild. And Nietzsche is their hero. The opposite of Jesus who taught that the measure of a strong arm is in how much it can help the weak. If all said: Oh! Im happy. I have food. I have internet. Let`s_just_keep_this_world_for_as_long_as_possible, and lay down our swords and differences we could all say: I_dont_need_King_Harald`s_army_to_protect_me. But now they let in a bunch of fascist, racial-imperialistic, medieval, Muslim, anti-western, and anti-humanist barbarians into our humanistic post-modern Norway! And what happens when integration fails, and the parenting culture disappears? EU BABYLON! A European Caliphate! Mixing cultures that won`t blend create the need for a strong state. Am I wrong? Since immigration came: Crime rates have skyrocketed, and the state continuously push new laws to impeach our freedom!
With Islamic oppression; freedom of speech is dead. The result is a stagnate, cold society that cannot evolve. Do you want 1000 more dark ages of war just to empower Rothschild dream of a control society? So we need the King`s army of police to protect us? To feed King Harald`s soul-farm? No!
After feeding the hounds of Hell for 4000 years, the bloodliners wont stop. THEIR world needs war to survive, make money, and keep them on top to ¨protect the people¨. NOT my world. Not voluntarist humanists. I`m an anarchist. I just want to go back to being the lost northern tribes of Norway, and reestablish the patriarchy/chieftainship of free NORSE tribes that emigrated here TRYING to survive the harsh WINTERS before the king INVADES us with taxes, and false-flag terror after 1000 years of brainwashing, and harsh living!
First the religious war-machine of Rome`s Vatican GLOBALISM ruined our Scandinavian Viking religion, culture and society. THEN they keep us as peasants. All Viking nobility dies during the Black Death except the Galtungs who should have been our current royals. We finally become an educated, civilized, rich country after 1000 years. Now we can make a name for ourselves! The country is finally united! We are a people! We have the same language! We are protestants and pagans! We are Norwegians! The Vikings will surely rise again; blessed with oil. We exit the dark age after 1000 years. Everything looks promising. But NO!
The Danish, jewish king tries to keep himself in power at the expense of his ¨alleged¨ people by appealing to the powerful minority through trumpeting against ¨racism¨. That comes from a big mouth.
This is to limit the growth of human social intelligence, and potential of evolution through creating a cold, stagnate society.
It`s the same that happened to the Vikings when the Vatican church took over, and this time, the Vatican will destroy us for good! Our religion, history, language, culture, ethnicity, and the alternative timeline of what Norway WOULD have been today is destroyed.
All because of the CIA Bushes starting Al Qaeda, and Isis to create their war for immigrants and oil. To serve their soul-tax-farm. GATHER YE TRIBES, AND ELECT YOURSELVES CHIEFS AND A KING! But wait. Harald rules, and his immigrants are here already. We have lost.
Now, King Harald, and Queen Elizabeth can destroy their own countries. ¨They`re just to stupid to think I`m evil! Here I sit as the biggest racist asshole! I am so good my very birth gives me a royal castle! And the military protects me! I can rule these peasants, and destroy them! That`s how I have fun!¨
What can we do, now that it has gone so far? We_can_only_believe_in_a_common_unity: Our global unity through Noahide, judeo-christian western-humanistic morals, and try to enlighten our immigrants through love and light. That`s all we CAN do. If we just did it. Try to integrate our immigrants. The system is corrupt, but a liberal revolution is at hand. Power to the people!